scifi:spacecraft:drives:chemical
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revision | ||
scifi:spacecraft:drives:chemical [2020/04/25 07:41] – sam | scifi:spacecraft:drives:chemical [2020/04/27 20:41] (current) – [Standard Engines] sam | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
are optimised for use at sea level. | are optimised for use at sea level. | ||
- | ^ Engine | + | ^ Engine |
- | | RD-4/ | + | | RD-4/ |
- | | RD-4/ | + | | RD-4/ |
- | | RD-4/ | + | | RD-4/ |
- | | RD-2/ | + | | RD-2/ |
- | | RD-2/ | + | | RD-2/ |
- | | RD-2/ | + | | RD-2/ |
- | | RX-2/ | + | |
- | | HX-2/ | + | |
Line 87: | Line 85: | ||
| Aerospike | | Aerospike | ||
| Aerospike | | Aerospike | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== TL 10 Engines ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Standard Engines ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | This is the pinnacle of chemical engines using classic fuels. More exotic fuels are required for any further improvement. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Engine | ||
+ | | RX-2/ | ||
+ | | HX-A/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== TL 11 Engines ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Monatomic hydrogen engines become available. These are not as efficient as nuclear engines, but are significantly cleaner. The only issue is fuel density is very low. By this point, pretty much all engines are of the aerospike design, since it provides a lot more flexibility and the material/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ^ Engine | ||
+ | | H1-A/ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
scifi/spacecraft/drives/chemical.1587800492.txt.gz · Last modified: 2020/04/25 07:41 by sam